On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 11:33:14AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi Rob, > > robh@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Tue, 06 Jun 2023 12:52:00 -0600: > > > On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 19:52:36 +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > List all the possible properties in the NAND chip as per the example and > > > set unevaluatedProperties to false in the NAND chip section. > > > > > > Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ingenic,nand.yaml | 4 ++++ > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > > > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' > > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): > > > > yamllint warnings/errors: > > > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ingenic,nand.yaml: Unable to find schema file matching $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/raw-nand-chip.yaml > > It seems like your automated tooling failed to apply the second patch > in this series (creating raw-nand-chip.yaml). It says "sha1 information > is lacking or useless". This work is based on a recent -rc so I'm not > sure what is "lacking or useless" in this case. The base used is rc1. > Anyway, do you plan to give this series a look anyway? Or should I > rebase against a specific branch? Yes, I'll leave it in the queue. I'm just getting back after being out a month. Rob
