On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 08:37:04AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/06/2023 09:08, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > Use the new top-level rpm-proc node instead of having a dummy top-level
> > /smd node that only contains the RPM but not other remote processors.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml
> > index c6930706bfa9..06e574239bd4 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml
> > @@ -120,10 +120,10 @@ examples:
> > [...]
> > + compatible = "qcom,msm8916-rpm-proc", "qcom,rpm-proc";
> >
> > - rpm {
> > + smd-edge {
>
> What about binding updates?
>
The binding for this is in PATCH 05/14. The old binding replaced here is
deprecated in PATCH 07/14.
> Anyway, this should be squashed with previous one.
>
Sure, I can squash in v2.
Thanks,
Stephan
