Hi Arnd,
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 10:26PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 01 December 2014 10:42:32 Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> > + usb_phy0: usb-phy@0 {
> > + compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
> > + #phy-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > };
>
> As discussed in an unrelated thread today, please drop the "@0" in the
> node name, since the device has no 'reg' property.
What is the best practice for naming such nodes then? On these boards
it's not the case, but Zynq has two USB cores. So, there may be DTs that
will have two phys in there. Would we just do 'usb-phy-0'?
Thanks,
Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
