Re: [RFC V1 0/8] CPUFreq: create platform-dev for DT based cpufreq drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 1 December 2014 at 19:41, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would prefer the /cpus node over the /chosen node because the former
> describes the hardware while the latter is supposed to be user-settable
> (on real open-firmware at least). But I think either one is better than
> using the / node compatible string.
>
> How about a "linux,cpu-dvfs-method" property in the root node? Would
> that work better for you than a "linux,dvfs-method" in the "/cpus"
> node?

I will choose "linux,dvfs-method" in the "/cpus" node.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux