On 31.05.2023 15:22, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > As pointed out in [1], the Linux implementation of RSC basically requires > (even if not explicitly) that we point it to a power domain which > represents the power state of the CPUs. In an effort to fulfill that > requirement, make it required in bindings and hook it up on all platforms > where I was able to do. This means all RPMh platforms, except > > - SC7180 > - SC7280 > - SA8775 > > As there wasn't an idle-states setup (which may be on purpose for CrOS > devices, certainly not for Windows SC7[12]80s) that I could validate. > (Doug, Bartosz, could you guys look into your respective platforms of > interest here?) > > This series also adds support for idle states on SM6350, as I was able > to add and test that. I noticed that 7280 is WIP: > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230512150425.3171122-1-quic_bjorande@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Konrad Dybcio (8): > dt-bindings: soc: qcom,rpmh-rsc: Require power-domains > arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: Add PSCI idle states > arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Flush RSC sleep & wake votes > arm64: dts: qcom: sc8180x: Flush RSC sleep & wake votes > arm64: dts: qcom: sdm670: Flush RSC sleep & wake votes > arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Flush RSC sleep & wake votes > arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: Flush RSC sleep & wake votes > arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Flush RSC sleep & wake votes > > .../bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml | 2 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000.dtsi | 1 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8180x.dtsi | 1 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm670.dtsi | 1 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 1 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi | 1 + > 7 files changed, 149 insertions(+) > --- > base-commit: d4cee89031c80066ec461bb77b5e13a4f37d5fd2 > change-id: 20230531-topic-rsc-35e838da9afb > > Best regards,
