Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: regulator: pca9450: add pca9451a support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31.05.23 08:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 31/05/2023 08:57, Joy Zou wrote:
>> Update pca9450 bindings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joy Zou <joy.zou@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
> 
> Subject prefix is: regulator: dt-bindings: pca9450:

Is there some way to have this consistent for all subsystems? Most
subsystems seem to use:

  dt-bindings: [subsystem]:

But some use:

  [subsystem]: dt-bindings:

Casual contributors (like me) will very often get it wrong on the first
try. Examining the history is extra effort that could be avoided and
often doesn't provide a definite hint as you find both variations in the
past.

Can we standardize this and make checkpatch validate the subject line?



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux