On 5/30/23 09:59, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
Marek, Olivier
On 5/24/23 17:39, Olivier MOYSAN wrote:
Hi Marek,
On 5/24/23 15:54, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 5/24/23 15:39, Olivier Moysan wrote:
Use STM32 ADC generic bindings instead of legacy bindings on
DHCOR DRC Compact board.
The STM32 ADC specific binding to declare channels has been deprecated,
hence adopt the generic IIO channels bindings, instead.
The STM32MP151 device tree now exposes internal channels using the
generic binding. This makes the change mandatory here to avoid a mixed
use of legacy and generic binding, which is not supported by the
driver.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-drc-compact.dtsi | 28
++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-drc-compact.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-drc-compact.dtsi
index 39af79dc654c..92d906bfd5d7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-drc-compact.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-drc-compact.dtsi
@@ -57,15 +57,35 @@ &adc { /* X11 ADC inputs */
status = "okay";
adc1: adc@0 {
I sent similar patch recently too:
[PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: Update to generic ADC channel binding on
DHSOM systems
But I needed to add #address-cells/#size-cells here and to adc@100,
otherwise DTB checker was complaining . Did you run DTB check and was
it OK on your side ?
The first patch in this serie adds the #address-cells/#size-cells to
the SoC DT. So, there is no need to add them later in the board DT.
I can send a v2 with your patch (after removing the cells properties
from the patch). Having all the patches in the same serie, will help
avoiding sequencing problems.
Do you agree with this ?
What is the status of this patch ?
Marek, I would prefer to take all ADC updates in this series if you agree.
I missed the reply from Olivier, sorry. Please pick the whole thing.
