On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:41:45AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 05:55:40PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * PPIs are optionally configurable, but we cannot distinguish
> > + * between high and low, nor falling and rising. Change the
> > + * type so that it passes the next check.
>
> This comment could do with a /lot/ of improvement. It sounds like the
> only reason this code exists is to bypass the check. If that's all
> that's being done, there's better ways to code it.
Hi Russell,
You are right, all I want to do is bypass the next check because *if*
the PPIs can be configured, then any combination is valid (edge
raising/falling, level low/high). In real systems, PPIs tend to be
configured with active level low. That falls the existing check.
If I understood more your thoughts on improving the comment then I can
try to come up with a better version.
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> --
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
> according to speedtest.net.
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
