On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 10:59:48PM +0100, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > 2023年5月27日 17:23，Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> 写道： > > On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 05:13:39PM +0100, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > >> My recommendation is leaving compatible string as is. > > > > "as is" meaning "as it is right now in Linus' tree", or "as it is in > > this patch"? > > Ah sorry I meant in this patch. > > Since there won’t be any new ls1x chip that will boot Linux any time soon (due to > Loongson move away from MIPS but LoongArch32 is undefined for now), and > rest compatible strings are wide enough to cover their family, I think the present > compatible strings in this patch describes hardware best. I don't see why new bindings being written for old hardware should somehow be treated differently than new bindings for new hardware.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
