On Fri, May 26 2023 at 10:36:32 PM +02:00:00, Konrad Dybcio
<konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 26.05.2023 22:21, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 26/05/2023 21:19, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 09:05:47PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 26/05/2023 20:46, Conor Dooley wrote:
+ - power-domain-names
Why is this now required?
Thanks,
Conor.
Its an accurate description of the power/clock tree to have the
top power
domain be switched on prior to the clocks that depend on it.
But what does that have to do with the *names* now being required?
oh the names
no toss that
this should be
if:properties:compatible:blahblahmsm8996:then:required:power-domain-names
The only compatible in this binding is qcom,msm8996-camss, so what
would this achieve?
Konrad
I think Yassine, you could probably include the majority of your
cover-letter text in this commit to explain this change a bit
better.
I think it would be good to have that regardless.
Cheers,
Conor.
bod
^^^ I've been trying not to think about rugby since the weekend
:(
Pockets O'Gara should have his paddy papers rescinded
