Hi Arnd,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 November 2014 08:15:47 Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>> > No, don't hardcode ARM specifics into a common binding either. I've looked
>> > at the ibm,associativity properties again, and I think we should just use
>> > those, they can cover all cases and are completely independent of the
>> > architecture. We should probably discuss about the property name though,
>> > as using the "ibm," prefix might not be the best idea.
>>
>> We have started with new proposal, since not got enough details how
>> ibm/ppc is managing the numa using dt.
>> there is no documentation and there is no power/PAPR spec for numa in
>> public domain and there are no single dt file in arch/powerpc which
>> describes the numa. if we get any one of these details, we can align
>> to powerpc implementation.
>
> Basically the idea is to have an "ibm,associativity" property in each
> bus or device that is node specific, and this includes all CPUs and
> memory nodes. The property contains an array of 32-bit integers that
> count the resources. Take an example of a NUMA cluster of two machines
> with four sockets and four cores each (32 cores total), a memory
> channel on each socket and one PCI host per board that is connected
> at equal speed to each socket on the board.
thanks for the detailed information.
IMHO, linux-numa code does not care about how the hardware design is,
like how many boards and how many sockets it has. It only needs to
know how many numa nodes system has, how resources are mapped to nodes
and node-distance to define inter node memory access latency. i think
it will be simple, if we merge board and socket to single entry say
node.
also we are assuming here that numa h/w design will have multiple
boards and sockets, what if it has something different/more.
>
> The ibm,associativity property in each PCI host, CPU or memory device
> node consequently has an array of three (board, socket, core) integers:
>
> memory@0,0 {
> device_type = "memory";
> reg = <0x0 0x0 0x4 0x0;
> /* board 0, socket 0, no specific core */
> ibm,asssociativity = <0 0 0xffff>;
> };
>
> memory@4,0 {
> device_type = "memory";
> reg = <0x4 0x0 0x4 0x0>;
> /* board 0, socket 1, no specific core */
> ibm,asssociativity = <0 1 0xffff>;
> };
>
> ...
>
> memory@1c,0 {
> device_type = "memory";
> reg = <0x1c 0x0 0x4 0x0>;
> /* board 0, socket 7, no specific core */
> ibm,asssociativity = <1 7 0xffff>;
> };
>
> cpus {
> #address-cells = <2>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> cpu@0 {
> device_type = "cpu";
> reg = <0 0>;
> /* board 0, socket 0, core 0*/
> ibm,asssociativity = <0 0 0>;
> };
>
> cpu@1 {
> device_type = "cpu";
> reg = <0 0>;
> /* board 0, socket 0, core 0*/
> ibm,asssociativity = <0 0 0>;
> };
>
> ...
>
> cpu@31 {
> device_type = "cpu";
> reg = <0 32>;
> /* board 1, socket 7, core 31*/
> ibm,asssociativity = <1 7 31>;
> };
> };
>
> pci@100,0 {
> device_type = "pci";
> /* board 0 */
> ibm,associativity = <0 0xffff 0xffff>;
> ...
> };
>
> pci@200,0 {
> device_type = "pci";
> /* board 1 */
> ibm,associativity = <1 0xffff 0xffff>;
> ...
> };
>
> ibm,associativity-reference-points = <0 1>;
>
> The "ibm,associativity-reference-points" property here indicates that index 2
> of each array is the most important NUMA boundary for the particular system,
> because the performance impact of allocating memory on the remote board
> is more significant than the impact of using memory on a remote socket of the
> same board. Linux will consequently use the first field in the array as
> the NUMA node ID. If the link between the boards however is relatively fast,
> so you care mostly about allocating memory on the same socket, but going to
> another board isn't much worse than going to another socket on the same
> board, this would be
>
> ibm,associativity-reference-points = <1 0>;
i am not able to understand fully, it will be grate help, if you
explain, how we capture the node distance matrix using
"ibm,associativity-reference-points "
for example, how DT looks like for the system with 4 nodes, with below
inter-node distance matrix.
node 0 1 distance 20
node 0 2 distance 20
node 0 3 distance 20
node 1 2 distance 20
node 1 3 distance 20
node 2 3 distance 20
>
> so Linux would ignore the board ID and use the socket ID as the NUMA node
> number. The same would apply if you have only one (otherwise identical
> board, then you would get
>
> ibm,associativity-reference-points = <1>;
>
> which means that index 0 is completely irrelevant for NUMA considerations
> and you just care about the socket ID. In this case, devices on the PCI
> bus would also not care about NUMA policy and just allocate buffers from
> anywhere, while in original example Linux would allocate DMA buffers only
> from the local board.
>
> Arnd
thanks
ganapat
ps: sorry for the delayed reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
