On Tue, 2023-05-16 at 11:41 +0200, Julien Stephan wrote: > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until > you have verified the sender or the content. > > > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 10:07:47AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 15/05/2023 11:05, Julien Stephan wrote: > > > From: Florian Sylvestre <fsylvestre@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > This adds the bindings, for the MIPI CD-PHY module v 0.5 embedded > > > in > > > some Mediatek soc, such as the mt8365 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Florian Sylvestre <fsylvestre@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Julien Stephan <jstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > What are the changes? IOW: changelog here or in cover letter. > > > > Hi Krzysztof, > I added a changelog in the cover letter, but I will try to be more > descritpive next time. Changes from v1 are mainly style issues fixed > (mostly from your first review) > > > Subject: you have some multiple spaces. > > > > Subject: drop driver. Bindings are not for drivers. > > > > > --- > > > .../phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5.yaml | 62 > > > +++++++++++++++++++ > > > MAINTAINERS | 6 ++ > > > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0- > > > 5.yaml > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,phy- > > > mipi-csi-0-5.yaml > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0- > > > 5.yaml > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 000000000000..5aa8c0b41cdf > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,phy-mipi- > > > csi-0-5.yaml > > > @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-Only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > > +%YAML 1.2 > > > +--- > > > +$id: > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5.yaml*__;Iw!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!kUABjbQO6-_jrANKiqoLPxZkh_0LAplQwlgCG9lhmCKm2ec8pCItYUB3-zQ2PGBnlAcgsBhwrOgi5qeilrddZ5s$ > > > +$schema: > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml*__;Iw!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!kUABjbQO6-_jrANKiqoLPxZkh_0LAplQwlgCG9lhmCKm2ec8pCItYUB3-zQ2PGBnlAcgsBhwrOgi5qeiABoSu-M$ > > > + > > > +title: Mediatek Sensor Interface MIPI CSI CD-PHY > > > + > > > +maintainers: > > > + - Julien Stephan <jstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > + - Andy Hsieh <andy.hsieh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > + > > > +description: > > > + The SENINF CD-PHY is a set of CD-PHY connected to the SENINF > > > CSI-2 > > > + receivers. The number of PHYs depends on the SoC model. > > > + Depending on the soc model, each PHYs can support CDPHY or > > > DPHY only > > > + > > > +properties: > > > + compatible: > > > + enum: > > > + - mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5 > > > > SoC based compatibles. 0-5 is odd. > > > > > + > > > + reg: > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > + > > > + '#phy-cells': > > > + const: 0 > > > + > > > + mediatek,is_cdphy: > > > > No underscores in node names. > > > > > + description: > > > + Specify if the current phy support CDPHY configuration > > > > Why this cannot be implied from compatible? Add specific > > compatibles. > > > > > > This cannot be implied by compatible because the number of phys > depends > on the soc and each phy can be either D-PHY only or CD-PHY capable. > For example mt8365 has 2 phy: CSI0 and CSI1. CSI1 is DPHY only and > CSI0 is CD-PHY Do the user need to know which type phy he will use? > > Regards, > Julien > > > + type: boolean > > > + > > > +required: > > > + - compatible > > > + - reg > > > + - '#phy-cells' > > > + > > > +additionalProperties: false > > > + > > > +examples: > > > + - | > > > + soc { > > > + #address-cells = <2>; > > > + #size-cells = <2>; > > > + > > > + mipi_rx_csi0: mipi_rx_csi0@11c10000 { > > > > No underscores in node names. How this is v2? > > > > > + compatible = "mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5"; > > > + reg = <0 0x11C10000 0 0x2000>; > > > + status = "okay"; > > > > Drop > > > > > + mediatek,is_cdphy; > > > + #phy-cells = <0>; > > > + }; > > > + > > > + mipi_rx_csi1: mipi-rx-csi1@11c12000 { > > > + compatible = "mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5"; > > > + reg = <0 0x11C12000 0 0x2000>; > > > + status = "disabled"; > > > > ??? > > > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof > >