On pią, 2014-11-28 at 11:21 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:09:44AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> > I understand your concerns here however I didn't want to overengineer
> > this. Is the same GPIO (on more complex PMICs) used in different
> > contexts? Like enable control and something more in the same time?
>
> Yes, and it's often reprogrammable at runtime.
I have doubts if generalized code could support such configuration...
>
> > Something like:
> > struct regulator_desc desc {
> > .name = "LDO1
> > .of_match = of_match_ptr("LDO1"),
> > .regulators_node = of_match_ptr("voltage-regulators"),
> > .ops = &max77686_ldo_ops,
> > + .of_ena_gpio = of_match_ptr("ena-gpios"),
> > ...
> > }
>
> Yes, and note that this also means existing bindings can use the core
> code.
Thanks for idea,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
