On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 02:38:43 -0800 Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:12:52AM +0000, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > Dear Marc and Liviu, > > > > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:39:28 -0800 > > Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On 27/11/14 16:21, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > > > The Cortex-A5x TRM states in paragraph "9.2 Generic Timer functional > > > > description" that generic timers provide a level not edge interrupt > > > > output. Fix the device trees to correctly describe this. > > > > > > > > While doing this update the CPU mask to match the number of described > > > > CPUs as well as the DT bindings documentation for Generic Timers. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > M. > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Arnd, Olof: This is on top of linux-next/master as it patches Juno's > > > > as well as all the other ARM DTs. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt | 8 ++++---- > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dts | 8 ++++---- > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts | 8 ++++---- > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dts | 8 ++++---- > > > > 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt index > > > > 37b2caf..6d2aa87 100644 --- > > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt +++ > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt @@ -27,10 > > > > +27,10 @@ Example: timer { > > > > compatible = "arm,cortex-a15-timer", > > > > "arm,armv7-timer"; > > > > - interrupts = <1 13 0xf08>, > > > > - <1 14 0xf08>, > > > > - <1 11 0xf08>, > > > > - <1 10 0xf08>; > > > > + interrupts = <1 13 0xf04>, > > > > + <1 14 0xf04>, > > > > + <1 11 0xf04>, > > > > + <1 10 0xf04>; > > > > clock-frequency = <100000000>; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > Does it mean we also need to fix the interrupt level description under > > arch/arm/boot/dts? I found they are also wrong or I misunderstand > > something? > > Hi Jisheng, > > It looks like Marc and I managed to confuse ourselves. The TRM for GIC-500 > and GIC-400 (basically covering most of GICv1 and > GICv2) clearly says > that for *PPIs* the level triggered interrupts are active-LOW. > > So, this patch is invalid and my v1 version is correct, but Marc tells that > in that case the GIC driver needs patching (which I'm going to look into). > Got it. Thanks for clarification. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html