On 19-05-23, 13:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2023, at 12:58, Stanley Chang[昌育德] wrote: > >> > >> I'm pretty sure that drivers/usb/phy/ is deprecated now... > >> > >> New drivers should be written for the generic PHY subsystem in > >> drivers/phy/. > > Indeed, I missed that in my review. > > > Thanks for your reminder. > > Will drivers/usb/phy be removed? > > Is it not allowed to add new drivers? > > > > In our application, driver/phy is not suitable. > > We need to notify the phy driver when the USB hub port status changes. > > However, generic PHY drivers are designed for various device's PHY. > > And it seems inappropriate to add this function. So we choose to use > > driver/usb/phy. > > If you run into something that works in the old usbphy layer > but can't be done in drivers/phy, I think the better solution > would be to change the drivers/phy/ code to add this. The is correct, phy interfaces can be improved upon and have been added upon as and when we have users. FWIW there are already usb phy drivers in Generic phy susbystem, so you need to really justify why you need a new interface? -- ~Vinod
