Hi Konrad, Sorry for the late reply, but I wanted to look at the latest downstream code before responding. On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 at 19:28, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 5.04.2023 09:28, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > > Add crypto engine (CE) and CE BAM related nodes and definitions to > > 'sm8150.dtsi'. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi > > index 9491be4a6bf0..c104d0b12dc6 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi > > @@ -2081,6 +2081,28 @@ ufs_mem_phy_lanes: phy@1d87400 { > > }; > > }; > > > > + cryptobam: dma-controller@1dc4000 { > > + compatible = "qcom,bam-v1.7.4", "qcom,bam-v1.7.0"; > > + reg = <0 0x01dc4000 0 0x24000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 272 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + #dma-cells = <1>; > > + qcom,ee = <0>; > > + qcom,controlled-remotely; > > + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x514 0x0011>, > > + <&apps_smmu 0x516 0x0011>; > > + }; > > + > > + crypto: crypto@1dfa000 { > > + compatible = "qcom,sm8150-qce", "qcom,qce"; > > + reg = <0 0x01dfa000 0 0x6000>; > > + dmas = <&cryptobam 4>, <&cryptobam 5>; > > + dma-names = "rx", "tx"; > > + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x514 0x0011>, > > + <&apps_smmu 0x516 0x0011>; > Downstream uses these (sid, mask) combos: > > qcedev: > 0x0506 0x0011 > 0x0516 0x0011 // equal to 0x506 0x11 > > qcom_cedev_ns_cb: > 0x512 0 > 0x518 0 > 0x519 0 > 0x51f 0 > > Shouldn't we use them too? Sure, but the following are the latest values used in the downstream .dtsi, so I used them in the latest version and tested with the same on sa8115p-adp and sm8150-mtp without any issues: qcedev: 0x0502 0x0641 0x0504 0x0011 qcom_cedev_ns_cb: 0x0506 0x0011 0x0508 0x0011 0x0512 0x0000 I dropped: 0x0514 0x0011 // equal to 0x504 0x11 0x0516 0x0011 // equal to 0x506 0x11 0x0518 0x0011 // equal to 0x508 0x11 Thanks for pointing this out. Regards, Bhupesh