On Fri, 19 May 2023 02:45:36 +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > The secondary CPUs in T-HEAD SMP capable platforms need some special > handling. The first one is to write the warm reset entry to entry > register. The second one is write a SoC specific control value to > a SoC specific control reg. The last one is to clone some CSRs for > secondary CPUs to ensure these CSRs' values are the same as the > main boot CPU. This DT node is mainly used by opensbi firmware. > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/riscv/thead,cpu-reset.yaml | 69 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/thead,cpu-reset.yaml > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): yamllint warnings/errors: dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/thead,cpu-reset.example.dts:18.35-25.11: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-0/cpurst@ffff019050: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/thead,cpu-reset.example.dtb: cpurst@ffff019050: control-reg:0: [255, 4278276100] is too long From schema: /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/thead,cpu-reset.yaml doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20230518184541.2627-5-jszhang@xxxxxxxxxx The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency should be noted in *this* patch. If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
