On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 11:55PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 11/27/2014 11:47 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 10:17PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> >> On 11/27/2014 02:08 PM, Kedareswara rao Appana wrote:
> >>> Instead of enabling/disabling clocks at several locations in the driver,
> >>> use the runtime_pm framework. This consolidates the actions for
> >>> runtime PM in the appropriate callbacks and makes the driver more
> >>> readable and mantainable.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Kedareswara rao Appana <appanad@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> Changes for v3:
> >>> - Converted the driver to use runtime_pm.
> >>> Changes for v2:
> >>> - Removed the struct platform_device* from suspend/resume
> >>> as suggest by Lothar.
> >>>
> >>> drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> >>> 1 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
> >>> index 8a998e3..1be28ed 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
> > [...]
> >>> @@ -1030,7 +1046,10 @@ static int __maybe_unused xcan_resume(struct device *dev)
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(xcan_dev_pm_ops, xcan_suspend, xcan_resume);
> >>> +static const struct dev_pm_ops xcan_dev_pm_ops = {
> >>> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(xcan_suspend, xcan_resume)
> >>> + SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(xcan_runtime_suspend, xcan_runtime_resume, NULL)
> >>> +};
> >>>
> >>> /**
> >>> * xcan_probe - Platform registration call
> >>> @@ -1071,7 +1090,7 @@ static int xcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>> return -ENOMEM;
> >>>
> >>> priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> >>> - priv->dev = ndev;
> >>> + priv->dev = &pdev->dev;
> >>> priv->can.bittiming_const = &xcan_bittiming_const;
> >>> priv->can.do_set_mode = xcan_do_set_mode;
> >>> priv->can.do_get_berr_counter = xcan_get_berr_counter;
> >>> @@ -1137,6 +1156,11 @@ static int xcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>
> >>> netif_napi_add(ndev, &priv->napi, xcan_rx_poll, rx_max);
> >>>
> >>> + pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
> >>> + pm_runtime_irq_safe(&pdev->dev);
> >>
> >> You use just clock_enable()/disable() in the runtime functions, thus you
> >> can say they are irq_safe. On the other the the zync grpio driver uses
> >> "full" prepare_enable/disable_unprepare calls. What's best practice here?
> >
> > IIRC, the prepare/unprepare functions can sleep. xcan_get_berr_counter
> > is called from atomic context. So, I think we have to use the
> > disable/enable functions without the prepare/unprepare.
> > In the GPIO driver the that problem does not exist.
>
> IC, yes, correct.
>
> This is why we introducted in other drivers a __get_berr_counter()
> function, that doesn't touch the clocks, which is used from within the
> driver (from the atomic contects), while get_berr_counter() will fiddle
> with the clocks. This function is used for the
> priv->can.do_get_berr_counter callback.
I have the feeling I'm missing something. If I remove the 'must not
sleep' requirement from the runtime suspend/resume functions, I get
this:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at drivers/base/power/runtime.c:954
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 161, name: ip
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
CPU: 0 PID: 161 Comm: ip Not tainted 3.18.0-rc1-xilinx-00059-g21da26693b61-dirty #104
[<c00186a8>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c00139f4>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
[<c00139f4>] (show_stack) from [<c055a41c>] (dump_stack+0x8c/0xd0)
[<c055a41c>] (dump_stack) from [<c0054808>] (__might_sleep+0x1ac/0x1e4)
[<c0054808>] (__might_sleep) from [<c034f8f0>] (__pm_runtime_resume+0x40/0x9c)
[<c034f8f0>] (__pm_runtime_resume) from [<c03b48d8>] (xcan_get_berr_counter+0x2c/0x9c)
[<c03b48d8>] (xcan_get_berr_counter) from [<c03b2ecc>] (can_fill_info+0x160/0x1f4)
[<c03b2ecc>] (can_fill_info) from [<c049f3b0>] (rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x794/0x970)
[<c049f3b0>] (rtnl_fill_ifinfo) from [<c04a0048>] (rtnl_dump_ifinfo+0x1b4/0x2fc)
[<c04a0048>] (rtnl_dump_ifinfo) from [<c04af9c8>] (netlink_dump+0xe4/0x270)
[<c04af9c8>] (netlink_dump) from [<c04b0764>] (__netlink_dump_start+0xdc/0x170)
[<c04b0764>] (__netlink_dump_start) from [<c04a1fc4>] (rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x154/0x1e0)
[<c04a1fc4>] (rtnetlink_rcv_msg) from [<c04b1e88>] (netlink_rcv_skb+0x68/0xc4)
[<c04b1e88>] (netlink_rcv_skb) from [<c04a045c>] (rtnetlink_rcv+0x28/0x34)
[<c04a045c>] (rtnetlink_rcv) from [<c04b1770>] (netlink_unicast+0x144/0x210)
[<c04b1770>] (netlink_unicast) from [<c04b1c9c>] (netlink_sendmsg+0x394/0x414)
[<c04b1c9c>] (netlink_sendmsg) from [<c046ffcc>] (sock_sendmsg+0x8c/0xc0)
[<c046ffcc>] (sock_sendmsg) from [<c04726bc>] (SyS_sendto+0xd8/0x114)
[<c04726bc>] (SyS_sendto) from [<c000f3e0>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48)
I.e. the core calls this function from atomic context. And in an earlier
thread you said the core can also call this before/after calling the
open/close callbacks (which applies here too, I think).
I think the callback is required to
- not sleep
- get the device in a power state that allows querying its registers
So, I don't see how splitting the xcan_get_berr_counter callback helps
here, especially since it is not even used within the driver.
Thanks,
Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
