Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] dt-bindings: clocks: atmel,at91rm9200-pmc: convert to yaml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey Claudiu,

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 08:18:33AM +0300, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> Convert Atmel PMC documentation to yaml. Along with it clock names
> were adapted according to the current available device trees as
> different controller versions accept different clock (some of them
> have 3 clocks as input, some has 2 clocks as inputs and some with 2
> input clocks uses different clock names).
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e5f514bc4bf7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Atmel Power Management Controller (PMC)
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description:
> +  The power management controller optimizes power consumption by controlling all
> +  system and user peripheral clocks. The PMC enables/disables the clock inputs
> +  to many of the peripherals and to the processor.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9g20-pmc
> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9260-pmc
> +          - const: syscon
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - atmel,at91sam9g15-pmc
> +              - atmel,at91sam9g25-pmc
> +              - atmel,at91sam9g35-pmc
> +              - atmel,at91sam9x25-pmc
> +              - atmel,at91sam9x35-pmc
> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9x5-pmc

Yet another combinations question for you...
With this binding the following is not possible:

"atmel,at91sam9x5-pmc", "syscon"

Is that intended?
I notice "atmel,at91sam9260-pmc" is able to appear as:

"atmel,at91sam9260-pmc", "syscon"

So the inconsistency stands out.

> +          - const: syscon
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - atmel,at91rm9200-pmc
> +              - atmel,at91sam9260-pmc
> +              - atmel,at91sam9g45-pmc
> +              - atmel,at91sam9n12-pmc
> +              - atmel,at91sam9rl-pmc
> +              - atmel,sama5d2-pmc
> +              - atmel,sama5d3-pmc
> +              - atmel,sama5d4-pmc
> +              - microchip,sam9x60-pmc
> +              - microchip,sama7g5-pmc
> +          - const: syscon

Otherwise, this looks grand to me.

Cheers,
Conor.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux