On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:08:35AM +0530, Sunil V L wrote: > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 01:17:03PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > > ISA string parsed for both DT and ACPI. > > > > For ACPI, moving to a per-extension bit in a bitmap and defining > > a new bit with every ISA extension will be very very inconvenient > > for updating the ACPI specs. We should continue the ISA string > > parsing at least for ACPI. > > > > For DT, users can either use "riscv,isa" DT property or use boolean > > DT properties. > > > From ACPI perspective, the format better be backed by unpriv (or any > other) spec from RVI considering it is a standard across OSs and to > avoid any maintenance issues. DT is also used across multiple OSes, I am not sure what your point is here. The problem, for DT in particular, is defining __which__ version of the unpriv spec meaning is derived from, not whether to use definitions from the specifications.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
