On 13/05/2023 16:44, Alim Akhtar wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2023 3:03 PM >> To: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@xxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm- >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx; andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx; >> mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx; hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx; >> ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxxx; >> benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; >> stanimir.varbanov@xxxxxxxxxx; dillon.minfei@xxxxxxxxx; >> david.plowman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; >> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; andi@xxxxxxxxxxx; >> alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx; aswani.reddy@xxxxxxxxxxx; >> pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [Patch v7] dt-bindings: media: s5p-mfc: convert bindings to json- >> schema >> >> On 11/05/2023 11:34, Aakarsh Jain wrote: >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx] >>>> Sent: 28 March 2023 20:06 >>>> To: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@xxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm- >>>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- >>>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Cc: m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx; andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx; >>>> mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx; hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx; >>>> ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxxx; >>>> benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; >>>> stanimir.varbanov@xxxxxxxxxx; dillon.minfei@xxxxxxxxx; >>>> david.plowman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; >>>> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; andi@xxxxxxxxxxx; >>>> alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx; aswani.reddy@xxxxxxxxxxx; >>>> pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Subject: Re: [Patch v7] dt-bindings: media: s5p-mfc: convert bindings >>>> to json- schema >>>> >>>> On 28/03/2023 13:47, Aakarsh Jain wrote: >>>>> Convert s5p-mfc bindings to DT schema format using json-schema. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> changes since v6: >>>> >>>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. >>>> >>>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. >>>> >>>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: >>>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new >>>> versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add >>>> the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on >>>> the version they apply. >>>> >>>> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=03601d03-62eb0848-0361964c- >>>> 74fe485fb305-ca0023b5279dd925&q=1&e=9490b51d-9547-4566-bb76- >>>> >> 8c1401745ae1&u=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv5.17%2Fs >>>> ource%2FDocumentation%2Fprocess%2Fsubmitting-patches.rst%23L540 >>>> >>>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Krzysztof >>> >>> >>> Hi Krzysztof, >>> >>> I don’t see this patch in linux-next. It's been more than a month now. >>> Please let me know if any other changes required. >> >> I already provided you review tag. > Thanks for your review. > The question was more on, if you will pick up this patch via your tree or this will go via Rob's or Media tree. > I will prefer if this goes via your tree. Generic recommendation is that all device-related bindings go via their subsystem, so in this case via media tree. I see in patchwork it is still in new state, so maybe was forgotten. OK, let me grab it. Best regards, Krzysztof
