Hi Krzysztof, On 5/12/23 08:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 11/05/2023 12:28, Javier Carrasco wrote: >> On 11.05.23 11:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 10/05/2023 15:50, Javier Carrasco wrote: >>>> The virtual-touchscreen object defines an area within the touchscreen >>>> where touch events are reported and their coordinates get converted to >>>> the virtual origin. This object avoids getting events from areas that >>>> are physically hidden by overlay frames. >>>> >>>> For touchscreens where overlay buttons on the touchscreen surface are >>>> provided, the virtual-buttons object contains a node for every button >>>> and the key event that should be reported when pressed. >>> >>> Hm, I don't understand - are these separate physical buttons? If so, why >>> would they be part of touchscreen? Where do the wires go? >> Those buttons are actually printed on some overlays which are mounted on >> top of the touchscreen and they are used to provide a predefined >> functionality to that touchscreen region. Any touchscreen with such a >> physical overlay with buttons printed on them or clipped touchscreen >> areas might use this functionality. >> >> These buttons are actually physical i.e. printed and with a given >> functionality, but still part of the touchscreen as the physical device >> is not aware of them. Therefore they only make sense in the touchscreen >> context. > > So basically you still have the same touchscreen under the buttons and > these are not separate devices. Whether someone put a sticker on > touchscreen, does not really change hardware behavior and it's up to > system to handle this. What you are trying to do here is to create > virtual buttons through Devicetree and DT is not for that. I have already addressed a similar statement here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230504042927.GA1129520@quokka/t/#m1a93595c36535312df0061459a1da5e062de6c44 but let me extend this comment a bit. The notion of "someone putting a sticker on touchscreen" does not really reflect the use case we have in mind. We are talking about devices that are shipped from the factory in a particular configuration, e.g., +-----------------------+---------+ | | power | | | button | | touchscreen +---------+ | (behind: display) | return | | | button | +-----------------------+---------+ Here, the real touchscreen is larger than the display. The display is behind the "touchscreen" part. Behind the buttons there are symbols engraved in metal or printed foils or what not. I just would like to make it clear that these symbols are not going to change. We believe that the engraved or printed symbols actually define the (expected) hardware behavior. Of course there is a virtual notion to that, and of course it would be possible to let the power button work as return button and vice versa in software. However, the user sees the engraved or printed symbols (which are not going to change) and expects the device to react appropriately. Now if you suggest that the system (that is user space, right?) should handle this, then the question would be which component is supposed to handle the touchscreen events and react accordingly. I don't have an answer to that and hope I don't need to find one. But independent of that, a configuration file is required that defines the area of the virtual buttons etc. Wouldn't this be similar to the (mostly) beloved xorg.conf containing the definitions of input devices? Best regards, Michael
