On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 04:22:51PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 17:07:59 -0300 > Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 5:06 PM Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Hi Fabio, > > > it uses a ADIN1300 PHY. > > > > > > The datasheet indicate that the "Management interface active (t4)" state is reached at most 5ms after the reset signal is deasserted. > > > > Please add this information to the commit log and please add a Fixes: tag. > > > > Thanks > > Hi, > I am trying to properly add a "Fixes: " tag, but the description for this tag indicates that it is to report that "the patch fixes an issue in a previous commit". > > In this case, I cannot identify a commit that introduced that bug, apart from the initial commit of the DTS file which didn't have the reset property present? Is the PHY on the SOM or the carrier? If the PHY is on the carrier, then the delay is a carrier property, and should be in the carrier .dts file. So use the commit for when the carrier DTS file was added. If the PHY is on the SOM, then use the commit for when the SOM DTSI was added. Andrew
