On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 22:33 +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> The OF_RECONFIG notifier callback uses a different structure depending
> on whether it is a node change or a property change. This is silly, and
> not very safe. Rework the code to use the same data structure regardless
> of the type of notifier.
I fell pretty good about this one except...
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> index b9d1dfdbe5bb..9fe6002c1d5a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> @@ -1711,12 +1711,11 @@ static void stage_topology_update(int core_id)
> static int dt_update_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
> unsigned long action, void *data)
> {
> - struct of_prop_reconfig *update;
> + struct of_reconfig_data *update = data;
> int rc = NOTIFY_DONE;
>
> switch (action) {
> case OF_RECONFIG_UPDATE_PROPERTY:
> - update = (struct of_prop_reconfig *)data;
Should we assert/bug on !update->dn / update->prop ?
(Same for the rest of the patch)
Or do you reckon it's pointless ?
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
