Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: light: ROHM BU27008

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/24/23 13:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 21/04/2023 11:38, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
The ROHM BU27008 is a sensor with 5 photodiodes (red, green, blue, clear
and IR) with four configurable channels. Red and green being always
available and two out of the rest three (blue, clear, IR) can be
selected to be simultaneously measured. Typical application is adjusting
LCD backlight of TVs, mobile phones and tablet PCs.

Add BU27008 dt-bindings.

Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../bindings/iio/light/rohm-bu27008.yaml      | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/rohm-bu27008.yaml

Filename like compatible, so rohm,bu27008.yaml

Thanks Krzysztof. I should've remembered this as you told me the same thing during the bu27034 review. Feel free to kick me atthe ELC-E if I do the same mistake with bu27010 as well ^^;


diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/rohm-bu27008.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/rohm-bu27008.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d942c2817680
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/rohm-bu27008.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/light/bu27008.yaml#

Does not look like you tested the bindings. Please run `make
dt_binding_check` (see
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst for instructions).


I actually did. But I did first run the dt_binding_check without filename - causing it to check all the in-tree bindings - which took a while. So, I went to have a lunch. When I came back I re-ran the check with the filename (DT_SCHEMA_FILES=...) - which gave me no errors.

I _assume_ this is because running the check for all bindings had already done <add step here> generating the warning, while re-running the check with the filename omitted the <add step here> and no longer displayed the warning.

In any case, I missed warning from full-check, and checker missed the warning when re-ran.


+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: ROHM BU27008 color sensor
+
+maintainers:
+  - Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx>
+
+description: |

Do not need '|' unless you need to preserve formatting.

Ok, thanks.

I'll fix these for v2 :)

Yours,
	-- Matti

--
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland

~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux