On 24/03/2022 12:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/03/2022 18:24, Jonathan Bakker wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 2022-03-23 8:15 a.m., Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 23/03/2022 16:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 23/03/2022 16:03, Jonathan Bakker wrote:
>>>>> Based on the device tree spec, clocks should be ordered tx/rx.
>>>>> Re-order from rx/tx to avoid warnings when running make dtbs_check
>>>>>
>>>>> Additionally, the number of #sound-dai-cells should be 1, not 0
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@xxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aries.dtsi | 2 +-
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi | 18 +++++++++---------
>>>>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aries.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aries.dtsi
>>>>> index 70ff56daf4cb..503b5a50ef1a 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aries.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aries.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> &i2s0 {
>>>>> - dmas = <&pdma0 9>, <&pdma0 10>, <&pdma0 11>;
>>>>> + dmas = <&pdma0 10>, <&pdma0 9>, <&pdma0 11>;
>>>>> status = "okay";
>>>>
>>>> Except that fix that's the same commit as here:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200907161141.31034-26-krzk@xxxxxxxxxx/
>>>> so just extend it.
>>>>
>>>> sound-dai-cells should go to a separate commit. But are you sure they
>>>> are correct? The Fascinate 4G seems to be using them as cells=0.
>>>
>>> See my previous patch and discussion:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200907161141.31034-10-krzk@xxxxxxxxxx/
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, I'd totally forgotten about this series from the past. I'll re-test
>> those commits and submit your copies of them in v2 if that's OK with you and
>> that they're confirmed functional?
>
> My dma fixes change lacked this aries fix. The sound-dai-cells needed
> more rethinking.
>
Hi Jonathan,
Any plans for checking/fixing/testing and resending the sound-dai-cells
fixes?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
