On 14/04/2023 13:29, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
>
>>
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> + - |
>>> + soc {
>>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>>> +
>>> + watchdog@802000040000 {
>>> + compatible = "marvell-octeontx2-wdt";
>>> + reg = <0x8020 0x40000 0x0 0x20000>;
>>
>> Are you sure that this is correct DTS? 32-bit numbers are usually 8-digit long. Plus
>> size of 0x20000 is crazy huge. And the unit address is a bit unusual. Are you sure
>> dtc W=1 does not say about any errors in your DTS?
>
> Each cell is 32bit, so if we specify less than upper values becomes zeros (0s).
... and what is the convention/coding style of your subarch? Is to have
short or 0-padded reg addresses?
Anyway, I have doubts this was tested, so please confirm that dtbs W=1
and dtbs_check produce no errors on your DTS. BTW, where is the DTS?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
