On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 09:36:15AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 14/04/2023 02:44, Dipen Patel wrote: > > This patch series mainly adds support for the Tegra234 HTE provider. In > > addition, it addresses dt binding comments which prompted code > > changes in the existing HTE provider driver without breaking the > > Tegra194 provider. The comments raised concern how existing code > > retrieves gpio controller node > > (the node is used to help namespace conversion between HTE and GPIOLIB). > > To help simplify that process, new DT property is suggested which adds > > gpio controller node in the HTE provider binding as phandle property. To > > conlude this patch series: > > - adds Tegra234 HTE provider > > - modifies existing provider code to address new dt binding for Tegra234 > > without breaking it for the Tegra194 chip. > > > > The V1 patch series: > > - Adds tegra Tegra234 HTE(timestamp) provider supports. > > - Updates MAINTAINERS file for git tree, mail list fields. > > - Updates devicetree and API documentations. > > - Enables HTE subsystem, Tegra194 and Tegra234 HTE providers > > by default in arm64 defconfig and dts files. > > All your emails miss PATCH prefix. Use `git format-patch` to generate > proper versioned patch. Stripping important part messes up with our > filters. We have quite a lot of emails, so proper filtering is important. I used to get this wrong as well because I didn't know (or perhaps it didn't exist yet at the time) --reroll-count|-v and used to manually override --subject-prefix. Thierry
