On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To date, all supported controllers have had the IRQEN register at offset > 0x00 and the IRQSTAT register at 0x04. So in DT we would typically see > something like: > > reg = <0xf0406800 0x8>; > > We still want to support this format, but we also need to support cases > where IRQEN and IRQSTAT aren't adjacent. So, we will amend the driver to > accept an alternate format that looks like this: > > reg = <0xf0406800 0x4 0xf0406804 0x4>; > > i.e. if the first resource_size() == 4, assume that the first resource > points to IRQEN and that the next resource points to IRQSTAT. If the > first resource_size() == 8, retain the current behavior. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@xxxxxxxxx> Hmm ... the more I think about this, the less I like it. Using the amount and size of the reg-properties to infer a certain layout seems rather hackish and dirty to me. Maybe we should just use different compatible match ids for that? E.g. brcm,bm7120-l2-intc for the 32-bit en/stat pairs, and e.g. brcm,bcm6368-l2-intc for the 64-bit wide one. Or maybe make the bcm63xx one a separate driver and let it share code with the bcm7120-l2-intc driver. This would avoid having to specify a lot of regs (let's assume we also add support for affinity), and cause a lot of io(re)map calls - the bcm63268 one would currently look like: reg = <0x1000002c 0x4 0x1000003c 0x4>, /* irq 0..31 -> mips irq 2 */ <0x10000028 0x4 0x10000038 0x4>, /* irq 32..63 -> mips irq 2 */ <0x10000024 0x4 0x10000034 0x4>, /* irq 64 .. 95 -> mips irq 2 */ <0x10000020 0x4 0x10000030 0x4>, /* irq 96 .. 127 -> mips irq 2 */ <0x1000004c 0x4 0x1000005c 0x4>, /* irq 0.. 31 -> mips irq 3 */ <0x10000048 0x4 0x10000058 0x4>, /* irq 32 .. 63 -> mips irq 3 */ <0x10000044 0x4 0x10000054 0x4>, /* irq 64 ... 95 -> mips irq 3 */ <0x10000040 0x4 0x10000050 0x4>; /* irq 96 ... 127 -> mips irq 3 */ where as with a different match id, we could rather allow something like reg = <0x10000020 0x20>, /* irq 0..127 -> mips irq 2 */ <0x10000040 0x20>; /* irq 0..127 -> mips irq 3 */ This would make the dts(i) files quite a bit more readable IMHO, and make it more likely that newer dts(i) files work with older kernels, e.g. where the mips irq3 routed registers were added - in the current style, the kernel would interpret these as additional irq banks. Not that I think this is expected/required to work, but it wouldn't hurt having at least a bit of backward compatibility for bisecting on a device that provides a newer dtb through the bootloader. Jonas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html