On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:11:23AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> DP PHY now require pmu-system-controller to handle PMU register
> to control PHY's power isolation. Adding the same to dp-phy
> node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> index 0a588b4..bebd099 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> @@ -732,7 +732,7 @@
>
> dp_phy: video-phy@10040720 {
> compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dp-video-phy";
> - reg = <0x10040720 4>;
> + samsung,pmu-syscon = <&pmu_system_controller>;
> #phy-cells = <0>;
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
> index 8617a03..1353a09 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
> @@ -503,8 +503,8 @@
> };
>
> dp_phy: video-phy@10040728 {
> - compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dp-video-phy";
> - reg = <0x10040728 4>;
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-dp-video-phy";
> + samsung,pmu-syscon = <&pmu_system_controller>;
> #phy-cells = <0>;
> };
>
It seems like these nodes have been in the Linux tree since 3.12 and
3.17, respectively and these changes break backwards-compatibility. Has
anyone thought about the possible consequences?
Although, looking more closely it seems like this isn't the first time
that backwards-compatibility was broken in these files, so perhaps
nobody cares...
Thierry
Attachment:
pgpoTN7CJ0ZdJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
