Re: [PATCH v8 5/8] of: i2c: Export single device registration method

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:46:31AM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:36:02 +0200
> , Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  wrote:
> > Dynamically inserting i2c client device nodes requires the use
> > of a single device registration method. Rework and export it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Wolfram, this patch and the next one only make sense in conjunction with the overlay
> patches, but they don't necessarily need to be merged via the same tree.
> I'm happy to take them, but am equally happy to have you take them
> (assuming I ack the next patch; I haven't looked at it yet). What is
> your preference?

OK, now I had the time to look at it, phew.

Is this targetted for 3.19? Then you can take it:
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

There is a minor conflict caused by this patch in i2c/for-next which
should be easy to solve, just remove the irq handling.

2fd36c552649 2014-10-30 15:59 Laurent Pinchart   o i2c: core: Map OF IRQ at probe time

If you target for later than 3.19, then we need to discuss again,
because there might be other i2c core changes coming in.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux