[CCing the stable list as well as Greg and Sasha so they can correct me if I write something stupid] On 06.04.23 10:27, Ricardo Cañuelo wrote: > > On 5/4/23 19:14, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Wait, what? A patch (5225e1b87432 ("ARM: dts: meson: Fix the UART >> compatible strings")) that was merged for v5.17-rc4 and is not in the >> list of patches that were in 4.14.312-rc1 >> (https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230403140351.636471867@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ >> ) is meant to suddenly cause this? How is this possible? Am I totally on >> the wrong track here and misunderstanding something, or is this a >> bisection that went horribly sideways? > > I didn't say this was introduced in 4.14.312-rc1, this has been failing > for a long time and it was merged for 4.14.267: > https://lwn.net/Articles/884977/ > > Sorry I wasn't clear before. Ahh, no worries and thx for this. But well, in that case let me get back to something from your report: >>> KernelCI detected that this patch introduced a regression in >>> stable-rc/linux-4.14.y on a meson8b-odroidc1. >>> After this patch was applied the tests running on this platform don't >>> show any serial output. >>> >>> This doesn't happen in other stable branches nor in mainline, but 4.14 >>> hasn't still reached EOL and it'd be good to find a fix. Well, the stable maintainers may correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know in that case it's the duty of the stable team (which was not even CCed on the report afaics) to look into this for two reasons: * the regression does not happened in mainline (and maybe never has) * mainline developers never signed up for maintaining their work in longterm kernels; quite a few nevertheless help in situation like this, at least for recent series and if they asked for a backport through a "CC: <stable@" tag – but the latter doesn't seem to be the case here (not totally sure, but it looks like AUTOSEL picked this up) and it's a quite old series. >>> #regzbot introduced: 5225e1b87432dcf0d0fc3440824b91d04c1d6cc1 Thx for getting regzbot involved, but due to your usage it now considers this a mainline regression, as 5225e1b87432 is a mainline commit. As this only happens in a particular stable tree, it should use a commit id from there instead: #regzbot introduced: 23dfa42a0a2a91d640ef3fce585194b970d8680c (above line will make regzbot adjust this) Ciao, Thorsten