On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 at 04:34, Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Joel, > > > Given we have acks on the bindings, I think it's safe to send the > > device tree changes now so we can merge what you have in the upcoming > > merge window. If there's changes we can modify or revert. > > OK, I'll get those into shape. > > There is one dependency on this though, and unfortunately it requires > solving *two* of the known-hard problems in computer science: > > Do we start at i3c0 or i3c1? I'd vote for i3c0, like we do for ethernet, i2c, spi, etc. It is annoying that aspeed chooses to start counting at 1, but at least we would be consistent with other parts of the kernel. Starting at 1 reminds me of doing matlab assignments at uni, so that's another reason to avoid it. > > [i3c1 would match the schematic...] > > Cheers, > > > Jeremy
