On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 18:03:33 -0800
, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> On 11/20/2014 05:53 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:36:03 +0200
> > , Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >> Add OF notifier handler needed for creating/destroying i2c devices
> >> according to dynamic runtime changes in the DT live tree.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> >> index e6da9d3..e751b78 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> >> @@ -1470,6 +1470,7 @@ struct i2c_adapter *of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(struct device_node *node)
> >> return i2c_verify_adapter(dev);
> >> }
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node);
> >> +
> >> #else
> >> static void of_i2c_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap) { }
> >> #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
> >> @@ -1955,6 +1956,71 @@ void i2c_clients_command(struct i2c_adapter *adap, unsigned int cmd, void *arg)
> >> }
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_clients_command);
> >>
> >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> >> +
> >> +static int of_i2c_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> >> + unsigned long action, void *arg)
> >> +{
> >> + struct device_node *dn;
> >> + struct i2c_adapter *adap;
> >> + struct i2c_client *client;
> >> + int state;
> >> +
> >> + state = of_reconfig_get_state_change(action, arg);
> >> + if (state == -1)
> >> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> >> +
> >> + switch (action) {
> >> + case OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE:
> >> + case OF_RECONFIG_DETACH_NODE:
> >> + dn = arg;
> >> + break;
> >> + case OF_RECONFIG_ADD_PROPERTY:
> >> + case OF_RECONFIG_REMOVE_PROPERTY:
> >> + case OF_RECONFIG_UPDATE_PROPERTY:
> >> + dn = ((struct of_prop_reconfig *)arg)->dn;
> >> + break;
> >> + default:
> >> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (state) {
> >> +
> >> + adap = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(dn->parent);
> >> + if (adap == NULL)
> >> + return NOTIFY_OK; /* not for us */
> >> +
> >> + client = of_i2c_register_device(adap, dn);
> >> + put_device(&adap->dev);
> >> +
> >> + if (IS_ERR(client)) {
> >> + pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%s'\n",
> >> + __func__, dn->full_name);
> >> + return notifier_from_errno(PTR_ERR(client));
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + } else {
> >> +
> >> + /* find our device by node */
> >> + client = of_find_i2c_device_by_node(dn);
> >> + if (client == NULL)
> >> + return NOTIFY_OK; /* no? not meant for us */
> >> +
> >> + /* unregister takes one ref away */
> >> + i2c_unregister_device(client);
> >> +
> >> + /* and put the reference of the find */
> >> + put_device(&client->dev);
> >> +
> >> + }
> >
> > Nit: odd whitespace
> >
> >> +
> >> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static struct notifier_block i2c_of_notifier;
> >> +
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> static int __init i2c_init(void)
> >> {
> >> int retval;
> >> @@ -1972,8 +2038,19 @@ static int __init i2c_init(void)
> >> retval = i2c_add_driver(&dummy_driver);
> >> if (retval)
> >> goto class_err;
> >> - return 0;
> >>
> >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> >> + i2c_of_notifier.notifier_call = of_i2c_notify;
>
> Wouldn't it be easier to just initialize i2c_of_notifier above instead of
> here in the code ? Or is there a reason for doing it here ?
Yes, absolutely. This code should also depend on CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC too,
not merely CONFIG_OF.
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
> >> + retval = of_reconfig_notifier_register(&i2c_of_notifier);
> >> + if (retval)
> >> + goto notifier_err;
> >> +#endif
We can also get rid of the ugly #ifdef in the body by creating empty
stubs for of_reconfig_notify_{register,unregister}() and doing the
following:
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC))
WARN_ON(of_reconfig_notifier_register(&i2c_of_notifier))
I picked up the patch into my tree and made the above changes because
they're pretty trivial. If Wolfram is okay with it then I can take the
whole series through my tree. Otherwise I'll put the of_reconfig_* empty
stubs into a separate branch that he and broonie can both pull.
g.
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> >> +notifier_err:
> >> + i2c_del_driver(&dummy_driver);
> >> +#endif
> >
> > Similar to my comment on the platform bus, don't break the entire bus if
> > registration of the notifier fails. I would drop the error case and just
> > do a WARN_ON() if it fails.
> >
> > Otherwise:
> >
> > Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >> class_err:
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_I2C_COMPAT
> >> class_compat_unregister(i2c_adapter_compat_class);
> >> --
> >> 1.7.12
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
