On 29/03/2023 12:39, zhuyinbo wrote: > > > 在 2023/3/28 下午8:57, Rob Herring 写道: >> >> On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:22:09 +0800, Yinbo Zhu wrote: >>> Add the Loongson platform spi binding with DT schema format using >>> json-schema. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <zhuyinbo@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> .../bindings/spi/loongson,ls-spi.yaml | 43 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> MAINTAINERS | 6 +++ >>> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/loongson,ls-spi.yaml >>> >> >> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' >> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): >> >> yamllint warnings/errors: >> >> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: >> Error: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/loongson,ls-spi.example.dts:22.28-29 syntax error >> FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree >> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:419: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/loongson,ls-spi.example.dtb] Error 1 >> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> make: *** [Makefile:1512: dt_binding_check] Error 2 >> >> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): >> >> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20230328112210.23089-2-zhuyinbo@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >> The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency >> should be noted in *this* patch. > Hi Rob, > > I'm sorry, actually, I don't know what the specific operation I should > do when I received the check warning > from your bot. Does it means that I should add dependency note into this > patch's changelog ? Yes, this is explicitly mentioned in the sentence you quoted. > or something else, I really > don't know. Actually, I'm always bothered by these things that how to > resolve the dependency issue for two > dependent patches that do not belong to the same series. Another approach, as Rob suggested last time, would be to just get rid of the dependency and open-code the clock IDs... Best regards, Krzysztof
