On 24/03/2023 07:52, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>> Fixes the following DT bindings check error:
>>>> ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected)
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 -
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>> index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>> @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 {
>>>> "jedec,ufs-2.0";
>>>> reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>,
>>>> <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>;
>>>> - reg-names = "std", "ice";
>>>
>>> This is also part of:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi
>>> but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch?
>>
>> I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT,
>> and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names.
>>
>
> The ufs-qcom driver accesses the "ice" registers by name, so the reg-names can't
> be removed from the device tree. A few months ago there was a patch to fix the
> device tree schema for qcom,ufs to include the reg-names. It looks like that
> patch got missed, though:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-2-dc7a04699579@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Exactly. This is why I never saw these warnings.
Neil, there are a lot of pending patches, so you need to be sure you run
dtbs_check with them applied.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
