Hi, Am 19.11.2014 um 13:50 schrieb Mason: > [...] I'm writing a driver for a temperature sensor, which is > supposed to work > within the hwmon/lm-sensors framework. > > The sensor's API consists of 3 memory-mapped registers, which are > accessible over the > SoC's memory bus. [...] > > 1) Which bus should I be using for this driver? Is the platform bus > appropriate? Probably. > 2) platform.txt states > >> Some drivers are not fully converted to the driver model, because they >> take >> on a non-driver role: the driver registers its platform device, >> rather than >> leaving that for system infrastructure. Such drivers can't be hotplugged >> or coldplugged, since those mechanisms require device creation to be in a >> different system component than the driver. > > How do I "leave device registration for the system infrastructure"? > Where should I put that code? > Is it a good idea to separate device registration and driver registration > in the case of a SoC, where the device is embedded in the SoC and is not > "hot-plugged" (or anything-plugged for that matter, it's just "there"). Since this appears to be about an ARM SoC according to your To list, in general, you create a device tree binding, that binding is registered within your platform/... driver code and referenced in the device tree for SoC or board, and then your driver will automatically be probed. > 4) Can I use platform_driver_probe, instead of platform_driver_register? Most likely you do not need to call either yourself. Just compare other platform drivers on the one hand, and temparature sensor drivers on the other (such as I2C based gmt,g781 / LM90). Did you already check whether there is a driver that is both? Regards, Andreas -- SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 21284 AG Nürnberg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
