On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 08:46:19PM +0800, zhuyinbo wrote: > I think add following change and that issue what you said will can be > fixed, in addition, the spin_lock > was also not needed. Do you think so? > @@ -101,8 +101,10 @@ static int loongson_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi) > if (spi->chip_select >= spi->master->num_chipselect) > return -EINVAL; > > + loongson_spi->hz = 0; > + loongson_spi->mode &= SPI_NO_CS; > + > spin_lock(&loongson_spi->lock); > - loongson_spi_update_state(loongson_spi, spi, NULL); Looks plausible, yes - I'd need to see the full thing to verify.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
