On 21.03.2023 09:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 21/03/2023 05:34, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 7:15 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 20/03/2023 19:09, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
Would mediatek,mtmips-clock.yaml make sense?
More, except:
1. This is not clock, but sysc.
Sergio, beware.
I meant, that's what I understood from what Sergio said. :)
Yes, you understood properly. I will use 'sysc' instead.
2. mips sounds redundant. Do you have rt2xxx and mt7xxx chips which are ARM?
All of the SoCs, RTXXXX, MT7620, MT7621, MT7628, MT7688 are MIPS. So I
decided to call this platform MTMIPS as I've seen MediaTek use this on
other projects like U-Boot. This is what I did on my pinctrl patch
series as well.
Ah, but indeed there are newer Mediatek MT6xxx and MT8xxx SoCs which are
ARM, so mediatek,mtmips-sysc would work.
I can use 'mediatek,mtmips-sysc.yaml' as the name but compatibles will
start with ralink. There are already some existent compatibles for
mt762x already having ralink as prefix, so to be coherent ralink
should be maintained as prefix.
The compatibles I mentioned start already with mediatek, so why do you
want to introduce incorrect vendor name for these?
Can you point out where these compatible strings for mt7620 and mt7628 are?
Arınç
