Hi, On 20/03/23 22:21, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Introduce digital RTC node in wakeup domain. Even though this has > no specific battery backup supply, this on-chip RTC is used in > cost-optimized board designs as a wakeup source. > > Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@xxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> > --- > Changes since v2: > - Just reviewed-by pickups > > V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230315170706.1598977-2-nm@xxxxxx/ > V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230311105850.21811-2-nm@xxxxxx/ > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi > index 38dced6b4fef..fec81546fbbd 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi > @@ -40,4 +40,14 @@ wkup_i2c0: i2c@2b200000 { > clock-names = "fck"; > status = "disabled"; > }; > + > + wkup_rtc0: rtc@2b1f0000 { > + compatible = "ti,am62-rtc"; > + reg = <0x00 0x2b1f0000 0x00 0x100>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 100 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + clocks = <&k3_clks 117 6> , <&k3_clks 117 0>; > + clock-names = "vbus", "osc32k"; > + power-domains = <&k3_pds 117 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>; > + wakeup-source; > + }; > }; I was just wondering why some of the rtctests show failures on this platform: https://gist.github.com/DhruvaG2000/5c6d8bb99b087308b916985d70f0c440 pass:5 fail:2 the test is compiled from tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c for arm64 target Is this expected? -- Best regards, Dhruva Gole Texas Instruments Incorporated
