Hi Stephen,
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 8:38 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quoting Sergio Paracuellos (2023-03-20 09:18:20)
> > Clock related code has been removed from 'arch/mips/ralink' folder and put
> > into drivers space. Hence remove clock related prototypes which are not
> > used anymore.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/mips/ralink/common.h | 3 ---
> > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/ralink/common.h b/arch/mips/ralink/common.h
> > index 87fc16751281..fcdfc9dc6210 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/ralink/common.h
> > +++ b/arch/mips/ralink/common.h
> > @@ -23,9 +23,6 @@ extern struct ralink_soc_info soc_info;
> >
> > extern void ralink_of_remap(void);
> >
> > -extern void ralink_clk_init(void);
>
> Why isn't this removed in the patch that removes the function?
Because the function exists for all the SoCs code and there are
several patches removing it; one per SoC, so I decided to remove this
at the end. Should I squash all patches together instead?
>
> > -extern void ralink_clk_add(const char *dev, unsigned long rate);
> > -
>
> Same comment.
>
> > extern void ralink_rst_init(void);
> >
Best regards,
Sergio Paracuellos
