On 20/03/2023 19:07, Arınç ÜNAL wrote: > On 20.03.2023 21:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 20/03/2023 17:18, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: >>> +properties: >>> + compatible: >>> + items: >>> + - enum: >>> + - ralink,rt2880-sysc >>> + - ralink,rt3050-sysc >>> + - ralink,rt3052-sysc >>> + - ralink,rt3352-sysc >>> + - ralink,rt3883-sysc >>> + - ralink,rt5350-sysc >>> + - ralink,mt7620-sysc >>> + - ralink,mt7620a-sysc >>> + - ralink,mt7628-sysc >>> + - ralink,mt7688-sysc >> >> One more comment - this and maybe other compatibles - have wrong vendor >> prefix. This is mediatek, not ralink. > > This platform was acquired from Ralink by MediaTek. I couldn't change > some existing ralink compatible strings to mediatek as Rob explained on > my pinctrl patch series that we don't do that. The compatible strings on > this patch series here are new but I'd rather keep the compatible > strings ralink to keep things consistent. The comment that you cannot change existing compatibles does not apply to these, because these are new. However indeed some SoCs have already compatibles with ralink, so it's fine for these. mt7620 and mt7628 are already used with mediatek, so these should be rather corrected to new prefix. Best regards, Krzysztof