On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:00 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 10:00 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:56 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> > > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> > > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> > > part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> > > recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> > > for presence of a property and nothing more.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Thanks for your patch!
> >
> > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> > > @@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ static int sh_pfc_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> > > * inside a subnode nor across subnodes.
> > > */
> > > if (!pmx->func_prop_name) {
> > > - if (of_find_property(np, "groups", NULL) ||
> > > - of_find_property(np, "pins", NULL)) {
> > > + if (of_property_present(np, "groups")||
> > > + of_property_present(np, "pins")) {
> > > pmx->func_prop_name = "function";
> > > pmx->groups_prop_name = "groups";
> > > pmx->pins_prop_name = "pins";
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This check is used to auto-detect if the standard property names
> > should be used, or the "renesas,"-prefixed ones.
> > As the last users of the latter were removed from DTS in v4.10,
> > perhaps I should just remove these checks instead?
>
> Sent a patch just doing that, so you can drop this chunk.
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/ff9c14781110bbf19b56b45dd1f01e6da90319ad.1678704441.git.geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx
So I need a new version of this patch before I can apply it
I guess, or there will be conflict with Reseas stuff?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
