On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 23:44:50 +0100 Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2023-03-16 17:44:28, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > <snip> > > > Should it inherit the common binding, or was it omitted for a reason? > > > > Harmless but little point as far as I can see given we don't happen > > to have any of the generic elements defined in the generic channel > > binding. > > Supposedly the reg property, and now also the node name. Up to you to > say whether I should inherit this (and strip out the common bits) or > just focus on renaming the node name in the existing binding to channel. > > - Marijn Just rename the node name. Jonathan
