El vie, 17 mar 2023 a las 17:27, Andrew Lunn (<andrew@xxxxxxx>) escribió: > > > > The proposed solution is too radical for a problem that was not properly > > > characterized yet, so this patch set has my temporary NACK. > > > > Forgive me, but why do you consider this solution too radical? > > I have to agree with Vladimir here. The problem is not the driver, but > when the driver is instantiated. It seems radical to remove a driver > just because it loads at the wrong time. Ideally you want the driver > to figure out now is not a good time and return -EPROBE_DEFER, because > a resource it requires it not available. Ok, I'm open to suggestions. Any ideas on how exactly to figure out when it's a good time to probe or return -EPROBE_DEFER instead? > > Andrew -- Álvaro.
