On 16/03/2023 22:15, Henrik Grimler wrote: > Previously, the mshc0 alias has been necessary so that > MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA are set for mshc_0/mmc_0. > However, these capabilities should be described in the device tree so > that we do not have to rely on the alias. > > The property mmc-ddr-1_8v replaces MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR, while bus_width = > <8>, which is already set for all the mshc0/mmc0 nodes, replaces > MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA. > > Also drop other mshc aliases as they are not needed. > > Signed-off-by: Henrik Grimler <henrik@xxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes since v4: > * Do not set mmc-ddr-1_8v for sdhci_0 on Exynos 4210, > following Marek's tests > > Changes since v3: > * Drop attempt at node sorting/cleaning > * Move two mmc alias additions to the other patch > * Update commit message > > Changes since v2: > * Set mmc-ddr-1_8v in device trees for mshc_0/mmc_0 > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5.dtsi | 1 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-monk.dts | 1 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts | 1 + Why you do not remove Exynos3250 aliases? Best regards, Krzysztof
