On 15/03/2023 01:09, Vijaya Anand wrote: > Convert the binding document for adi,adau17x1 from txt to yaml > so one could validate dt-entries correctly and any future additions > can go into yaml format. Add address and size cells to example to > prevent errors regarding reg format. Why this is still RFC? RFC means it is not ready for applying, not full review, just some glance and comments. Some maintainers will not apply RFC patches at all. What do you question here? > > Signed-off-by: Vijaya Anand <sunrockers8@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxx> > --- > Changes since v1: > - added 'Codec' in title to clarify type of devices > - put compatible devices in lexographic order > - changed description of clocks > - changed 'unevaluatedProperties' to 'additionalProperties' > - changed node names to be generic Best regards, Krzysztof
