Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: rockchip: add bindings for the mmc clock phases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Sorry for my previous mail, I sent it as HTML and also top posted.
Here it goes again:

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It looks like you are adding new clocks to handle the phase requirement.
> Is that the right thing to do? Don't these clks already exist (e.g.
> SCLK_SDMMC)?
I actually need to control 2 phases, one of them is used when
outputting data, the other when sampling. Sunxi does something
similar: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/273273.html

Another reason it wouldn't work is because the upstream clock(eg
SCLK_SDMMC) is twice as fast as the real clock(see RK3288_CLKGEN_DIV
in drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c), since that clock goes to a /2
divider to be able to do the 90 degree clock phases.

Alexandru Stan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux