Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Monday 17 November 2014 15:30:32 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Use dynamic allocation of GPIOs instead of looking at the gpio%u alias
>> in DT.
>> ---
>> - Is this correct? Not having to care about the alias would simplify the
>> to-be-written DT binding documentation.
>> - Completely untested.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>
> This will obviously break any user that expects a particular gpio
> number, in particular board files, but I guess also user space
> that tries to access the gpios through sysfs.
>
> If you don't have any of those, I guess it's correct.
Emev2/kzm9d was the first DT-only shmobile SoC/board, so the kernel
part should be OK.
No idea about userspace.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
