On 9.03.2023 14:07, Michael Walle wrote:
Am 2023-03-09 12:39, schrieb Rafał Miłecki:
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
With the introduction of NVMEM layouts we should prefer and support
describing all NVMEM devices content in the "nvmem-layout" node. That
inludes using it for fixed NVMEM cells (those with hardcoded offset &
size).
This seems to be cleaner design and more explicit.
Introduce a binding allowing fixed NVMEM cells as a type of layout. To
avoid code duplication put shared part in the fixed-cell.yaml.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
I don't feel comfortable to add an acked-by or reviewed-by here
because I don't do much with dt-bindings myself, but this looks
good to me.
Thank you!
From a device tree binding POV, could there be a
nvmem-layout@0 {
reg = <0>;
compatible = "layout1";
};
nvmem-layout@1000 {
reg = <1000>;
compatible = "layout2";
};
for partitioned eeproms for example?
Maybe. Could you send a patch adding such binding with a proper
explanation what devices need it, please? It's out of scope of this
patch.
